Judgmental, intolerant and proud.

“We live in a day and age in which the only thing that it is wrong to believe, is that it’s wrong to believe that somebody’s wrong.” – David Assherick

It’s a funny thing when everyone’s beliefs are considered of equal value. “We have no right to judge the beliefs of others.” Why not? We’ve come so far because of judging beliefs as bad. Imagine if we considered human sacrifice just another belief that’s ok, simply because it’s there?

From IMDb

I am judgmental, and believe we should be. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with judging Cardinal Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict) as immoral for ordering the repeated covering up of child molestation by priests. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with judging someone who repeatedly abuses kids (even if it’s because God told him to) of being abusive, there’s a pattern. I fail to see why judgmental is an insult, surely if people weren’t judgmental, then there’d be no morality at all?

I think it’s good to be intolerant, society is intolerant, we don’t tolerate fraud (unless it’s a religious movement), we don’t tolerate human sacrifice, drunken driving, or mass murder. Some of us don’t have an issue with mass murder and thus consider Moses to be a good moral leader. But in general, society has benefited from intolerance.

Being intolerant or judgemental is limited, I don’t think it is ok to judge someone for being black, or to be intolerant of someone because they choose to eat meat, and I don’t. I don’t think that being intolerant of someone’s sexuality because of a verifiably false Bronze Age text is good either. I do, though, think that being intolerant of a text that encourages child abuse, homophobia, racism, war mongering, mysoginy and fraud, is a good thing.

I don’t mind people being intolerant of my beliefs, but I expect as much as I give. I will always give a reason, “god said…” Isn’t a reason. “You have no right to judge,” isn’t a reason. people can judge me, I don’t mind, there’s a lot of bad stuff to be judged, and I’m not going to hide behind a poor excuse and pretend my evils don’t affect others.

We have outlawed human sacrifice because we are judgmental and intolerant. We have outlawed pot smoking because we don’t take Rastafarianism as seriously as Islam or Christianity, and consider pot smoking worse than child abuse and mysoginy. This is intolerant and judgmental, the fact that it is an incorrect judgment is beside the point, it is judgmental, and most people accept it.

We are intolerant of allowing religious practices such as already mentioned, and indeed, the vast majority of the global population follows an Abrahamic God, who is by nature intolerant and judgmental, and encourages that in His followers. This 52 or 53% of the global populace are fiercely intolerant, leading to wars and other civil unrest. But say something about their beliefs, and you’re intolerant and judgmental, and they get very upset, and stamp their feet, and send people to kill you for drawing pictures, or writing books, they don’t like.

We’ve dispensed with human sacrifice, and most western people recognise that animal sacrifice is also cruel and serves no purpose. We’ve decided that the Sun is probably just a “mass of incandescent gas” and not Ra riding his chariot across the sky. We make jokes about flat earth beliefs, even though the most popular religious text in the world implies geocentricism and a flat earth. We have done this through judging some ideas as objectively incorrect, or in some cases even harmful.

Why then, would it be an bad thing to say beating kids is abusive, even if your bronze age role model disagrees. Why would it be bad to accept that threatening people with Hell is so obviously not loving. Why is it seen as wrong to point out that Christians happily accept the incredible of the resurrection while rejecting the uncomfortable in Jesus teachings of giving all possessions away or removing limbs. It is judgmental and intolerant, of course, but it is also true. How is this a bad thing, if not for people thinking like this, we’d probably still be allowing human sacrifice.

So, I am judgmental, I like making judgments before doing stupid things, like beating children. I’d like to judge that as wrong, and anyone who does it as immoral, and I won’t apologise for that. I am intolerant, I am intolerant of bad ideas that lead to objectively bad choices, like abusing children or threatening people with hellfire and brimstone, which is psychological abuse. I won’t apologise for that either. And if you believe your beliefs are above judgment, and use insults like, “you’re intolerant and judgmental,” I’ll say, “thank you, do you have any good reasons for why you think I’m incorrect?”


5 thoughts on “Judgmental, intolerant and proud.”

  1. ” intolerant of a text that encourages”

    People still read Aristotle even though Aristotle was dead wrong on a lot of things because some of Aristotle is still relevant to us (such as on ethics) and requires one to think, and the rest gives context to the next nearly two thousand years of history.

    The question is what is the Bible? Is it an infallible sacred text? Is it a compilation of historic texts and inspired texts? Was it heavily edited? Is the history done more from a propagandist perspective of ancient king than a fully accurate history of God’s dealing with the kings people? Who wrote what when and how do we know for sure? What assumptions do we bring to the text? Is it complete? What of Jubilees and Enoch? Where does the Shepard of Hermes and other such text fit in? What of the gnostic texts? How, or does it, relate to the sacred texts of other religions and other peoples? Do we actually know?

    So judgement is certainly needed on the subject.

    Pretty sure that removing of limbs per Jesus was metaphor.

    1. I’m pretty sure resurrections in religious ritual are a metaphor.

      Jesus resurrection could simply have pointed to the symbolic death of the old ways and birth of the new. Christians acknowledge that moral systems were updated around that period of time. Christ was reborn no longer the miserable vindictive type of old thinker, but reborn a more compassionate thinker (with some hellfire and brimstone, what would a compassion be without threats of violence?)

      It seems to be entirely allegorical of a shift in mindset, brought upon by a very progressive, yet very human thinker. One who was still so human is his disdain and contempt for those who would disagree with him. Rather arrogant. Prone to making errors in believing OT stuff we’re pretty certain didn’t happen, and prone to making outrageous claims. The death and resurrection was to symbolise the separation of the philosophy, from it’s imperfect origin.

      See, I can play the metaphor game to, how do we know which is metaphor and which is literal?

      And yes, we know we have all these problems with the Bible, which makes a deity as powerful as the Bible depicts so unlikely, since you wouldn’t expect these problems from a bloke who knows everything.

      1. For one thing, Jesus never cut off someones limbs but the gospels purport to be accounts His resurrection.

      2. Well, he didn’t command you to cut off other people’s limbs, just your own, and like you said, he was sinless, so he never needed to cut his own off, I think he meant it literally.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s